Oscar Pistorius blamed for concocting record in third day of interrogation

Pistorius flame broiled on Day 5 of trial

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
 Oscar Pistorius denies realizing that Reeva Steenkamp was behind entryway when he terminated

 The court is dismissed until Monday at the prosecutor's appeal

 Prosecutor Gerrie Nel questions why Pistorius didn't get some information about commotion

 The arraignment is attempting to demonstrate past sensible uncertainty Pistorius executed her deliberately

(CNN) - Oscar Pistorius confronted an alternate day of determined interrogation Friday as the arraignment tested his record of the killing of his mate, Reeva Steenkamp.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel has blamed the player for concealing reality about the demise of Steenkamp, whom he shot a year ago through a shut latrine entryway in his home in Pretoria, South Africa.

His inquiries again looked to undermine Pistorius' unwavering quality and dependability and to depict the Olympic competitor as somebody who was imagining his form of occasions and "customizing" confirmation to suit his story.

As Nel turned at the end of the day to the early hours of Valentine's Day 2013, he over and again tested Pistorius over his activities in the minutes paving the way to Steenkamp's demise.

The arraignment's contention is that Pistorius shot Steenkamp purposefully after a warmed contention. Pistorius does not deny shooting her yet demands that he confused her for an interloper.

Gerrie 'The Bull Dog' Nel on the ambush

Online networking responds to Pistorius trial

Pistorius round of questioning gets contentious

'I was more into Reeva than she was me'

Inside the brain of Oscar Pistorius

Pistorius said he thought he heard the latrine entryway opening before he let go.

"I didn't propose to shoot. My gun was pointed at the entryway in light of the fact that that is the place I accepted that some person was," he said. "When I heard a commotion, I didn't need to think, and I shot - I discharged my weapon. It was a mischance."

Nel, known in South African lawful loops for his bulldog-like methodology to interrogation, reacted to Pistorius' affirmation very nearly with disdain.

"Your adaptation is improbable to the point that no one might ever surmise that it was sensibly, conceivably accurate," he said.

Nel then pounded Pistorius on whether he had known Steenkamp was in the latrine when he terminated.

"You knew Reeva was behind the entryway, and you shot at her," Nel said more than once.

"That is not accurate," Pistorius answered in a low tone.

That sensational minute was when Nel requested the trial to be dismissed until Monday morning.

Prosecutor: You needed to shoot

Pistorius prior denied being "primed to shoot" as he went to the lavatory where he says he heard what he thought was an interloper.

Be that as it may he concurred that he had taken off the wellbeing get so he could fire if necessary. "I would not like to take anyone's life. I shouted for the interlopers to escape my home," he said.

"You needed to shoot," fought Nel, who on Thursday tried to construct a picture of Pistorius as a haughty firebrand who is careless with firearms.

Pistorius answered that there is a "gigantic distinction" between being primed for something and needing to do it.

Asked by the prosecutor for what valid reason he approached the obvious danger as opposed to looking to move out of damage's direction, the competitor said it was his in his tendency to react that way.

"I needed to put myself between the apparent peril and Reeva," he said. "I wish I finished all these different things put to me."

Nel additionally contended that it was "not conceivable" that Steenkamp might not have reacted when Pistorius shouted to her about what he thought was an interloper in the house, as he has said happened.

Steenkamp was just 3 meters from Pistorius at the time, behind the latrine entryway, the prosecutor said.

"She would've been scared, yet I don't feel that would've headed her to get out," Pistorius said, contending that Steenkamp might have accepted the risk was getting closer.

"She wasn't frightened of anything with the exception of you. She wasn't frightened of an interloper. She was frightened of you," answered Nel.

The prosecutor additionally pressed Pistorius over whether he heard a lady shouting throughout the shots he shot, as a few witnesses have said they listened. Pistorius said he didn't.

Pistorius: I was focused on the danger

'I was more into Reeva than she was me'

Steenkamp writings to Pistorius read in court

Pistorius witness: I heard shouting

Pistorius has threatening interrogation

As Nel experienced the occasions paving the way to the point of the shooting, Pistorius said that in the wake of getting up to close an overhang entryway and move fans inside, he heard the restroom window sliding open and pummeling into the casing.

Nel over and again asked him for what good reason he hadn't by then asked Steenkamp whether she excessively had heard the commotion.

Pistorius answered that he didn't on account of he was certain about what he had listened. He said he whispered to Steenkamp to get down and call police.

Nel approached whether he had held up for a reaction, as he said might have been sensible, calling attention to that his ex Samantha Taylor had affirmed he had completed that on a past event when he'd heard a commotion.

"I never held up for a reaction. ... My entire body was focused on the danger," Pistorius replied.

Nel's inquiries then concentrated on the position of specific things in the room, including a duvet, the fans and a couple of pants, all of which Pistorius says were moved by police. Nel looked to contend that they don't backing Pistorius' form of occasions.

At one point, the judge decried Nel for calling Pistorius a liar and let him know to brain his dialect.

More than once, Nel recommended that Pistorius experienced issues recalling what happened in light of the fact that he had made things up.

Pistorius got passionate as the round of questioning kept, provoking Nel to ask him for what good reason.

"This is the night I lost the individual that I thought about. I don't know why individuals wear'